Ugandan Media Destined for Turbulent Times as Museveni Clings to Power
by
Valerian Kkonde
PEARL NEWS SERVICE
To appreciate what exactly lies ahead
for independent journalists, independent media houses and freedom of expression
in Uganda, two incidents have to be put into perspective. This year’s World
Press Freedom Day, May 3, came after the February 18, 2016 greatly flawed
Presidential elections, and nine days before Museveni swears in the sixth time for
another five-year term.
Museveni has been in power for thirty
years now. The means he has applied to cling to state power are similar to
those he used to capture it. It all has to do with nepotism, oppression,
brutality and bloodshed. That is why opposition to his rule is mounting every
other day, even among those thought to be his lieutenants and constituents.
On May 3, the world celebrates the
fundamental principles of press freedom and gage the state of press freedom
around the world. The day is further used to defend the media from attacks on
their independence and to pay tribute to journalists who have lost their lives exercising
their noble profession, many times referred to as the Fourth Estate. The
purpose is to highlight the importance of the Press in society, ranking it just
after the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary.
The World Press Freedom Day was
proclaimed by the UN General Assembly in 1993 following a recommendation
adopted at the 26th Session of UNESCO’s General Conference in 1991.
This in turn was a response to a call by African journalists who in 1991
produced the landmark Windhoek Declaration on media pluralism and independence.
Enemies of the Press, especially
dictators and criminals, feel insecure when the Press plays its vital role of
shinning a light on the injustices, robberies, nepotism, cruelties, the many
challenges and hopeful stories the world over.
Through the Press, citizens get to know
the truth about their countries, rulers, leaders and their policies, and also
help the voiceless be heard. It is hear that dictators and criminals have
issues with the free Press. In that spirit, since the Presidential elections, switching
off the internet has become the norm whenever Museveni feels like Ugandans
should not get certain information at any particular time.
Uganda’s Yoweri Museveni is at war with
independent journalists and media houses as they struggle to hold him
accountable to Ugandans. In the process journalists are harassed, their
equipment destroyed and media houses shut down.
Many journalists should get ready for trumped up charges and stints in
prison without fair trial. Abductions and incarceration in torture houses
cannot be ruled out.
The more Museveni holds onto power, the
more opposition to his regime grows. Worse still, a lot leaves much to be
desired as the quality of life for majority Ugandans nose dives. Nepotism has
replaced hard work and qualification to further undermine service delivery.
Even the law courts are no longer considered secure resorts for redress.
In a bid to search for answers, one is
tempted to ask whether the people from Eastern Uganda, who occupy the most
influential positions are non performers, bad managers, or that Museveni is the
problem. The country has gone to the dogs under their trademark noses and
familiar names.
The February 18, 2016 Presidential
elections, considered the most flawed in Uganda’s history, are laden with
significant information on the past, present and future of the country. They
look like the turning point for the much sought after change Ugandans seek and
the Press covers as a special beat.
Forum
for Democratic Change (FDC) Presidential candidate, Kizza Besigye, maintains
that he had won the election with 52% votes but was rigged out by the Electoral
Commission in connivance with Museveni. On May 11, 2016 he took oath as the
people’s president.
Besigye’s claims are backed up by the
European Union and Commonwealth election observers who call the election
“anything but free and fair.” The crack down on the Opposition is another
pointer to government’s attempts to cover up the truth and deny Ugandans the
opportunity to make their own decisions.
The brutal silencing of dissent further
points to attempts by the guilty to stifle the freedom of expression. All this
draws the Press’ curiosity, leading to analysis of the situation so as to get
to the story behind the story. On many occasions, the government resorts to the
use of the gun while the Opposition takes to criticizing situations, posing
questions and drawing conclusions.
It is under such situations that
journalists are called upon to offer a platform for exchange of views on issues
of governance, shed a light on the injustices, oppression, lies, brutalities
and hold government accountable. Journalists, in their bid to tell the truth,
have been ordered to stop covering Besigye’s activities as well as others
organised by the Opposition. Museveni wants more coverage for himself and none
for the political opponents. That type of work is suited for courtyard fiddle
blowers and not journalists.
With almost all local leaders in the
capital Kampala belonging to the Opposition, and being well versed with issues
of governance and accountability, there is no way the Press is going to turn a
blind eye to their demands and deny them an opportunity to be heard as well as
those they represent.
The other unfortunate bit is that
government has denied the Opposition space on national media. Government is
actually tempting the Press to act unprofessionally by giving one side of the
story. The effectiveness on the news media depends on the ability of
journalists to gain access to information.
Museveni’s claims that he wants to fight
corruption are betrayed by his hatred for critical and independent journalists.
He should know that a critical element of a country’s anti- corruption program
is an effective media. As such the media raises public awareness about
corruption, its causes, consequences and possible remedies. Museveni should
advocate for the funding of the independent Press the way he does for Defence and
State House.
Again, the media investigates and
reports incidences of corruption thereby aiding other oversight bodies. With
the ill equipped anti corruption government bodies, Museveni should be very
supportive of the media unless he has ulterior motives.
Museveni’s failure to deliver on his
promises and the surge of the Opposition are not the making of the press. But
what is important is to allow all parties to reach out to Ugandans to enable
them make informed decisions. And it is only the press that can ably offer that
platform.
Clinging
to power is the leading factor for identifying Africa’s rulers who are failures.
No matter how many excuses they may come up with, at the end of the day all
they do is engage in rhetoric devoid of substance. When the public demands for
accountability and even prefers leaders of their choice, the demagogues turn
their guilt to the Press and hold it responsible for their own non performance,
greed, brutality and at times stupidity.
Museveni has a lot of explanation to
make and a lot to cover up. It is because he is the president and has been
around for at least thirty years. He finds himself between a hard place and a
rock. But it is all his own making. The earlier he stopped blaming the Press
for his failures the better for him and Uganda. The Press reports about his
failures and successes in equal measures so as to come up with a balanced and
informative news item.
During the last presidential campaigns,
two debates were organised for the candidates. Museveni attended the second one
after calling the idea childish. The Press covered the colourful event and the
public made its views known about the candidates, judging their competence
depending on their ability to articulate issues of concern to Ugandans. Even
when he showed up, he had all sorts of conditions to set, including barring the
Voice of America Editor, Shaka Ssali, from putting questions to him! He also
decided the panelists!
Africa’s demagogues are also shy of the
press. It seems it is their way of admitting failure. They attack the Press
because it exposes them. Rarely do they appreciate that the Press helps them
become stronger and accountable. Their political opponents take advantage of
this to beat them at their own game and win the electorate to their side. This
is not the Press’ fault.
Besigye, the thorn in Museveni’s flesh,
is so articulate and down to earth that he is a darling of every independent
journalist and media house. No editor, worth the name, has the power to turn
down his side of the story. In any case,
Ugandans have a right to know what the man who wants to be their president has
to offer and go ahead and rate him with the incumbent.
An independent Press cannot buy, let
alone sell the notion that Museveni alone has the ability to be president of
Uganda. This would be a catastrophe on the part of the Press and the country at
large. The Press cannot abscond on its duty to inform and empower the public
with information.
Journalists have a duty to give both
sides of the story. This means that they will continue telling their viewers,
listeners and readers what Besigye has to say as well as Museveni’s story. Ugandans
too will be given the platform to criticise those in power as well as those vying
for it. That is why the inevitable is bound to continue happening.
It is certain as the day is followed by
night that, as opposition to his rule gains ground every passing moment, Museveni is going to brutally silence
dissent and stifle the freedom of expression. As a result, journalists will be
imprisoned, harassed, beaten, their equipment destroyed or confiscated,
employment will be lost and some will even be killed. As violence against
journalists will increase, so will the impunity.
Museveni’s sixth term will be a hive of
activities on part of the brutal Police, partisan army and cadre judges; they
are bound to descend on the Opposition and the Press to stifle the freedom of
expression, freedom of the Press and cover up the truth.
Journalists and their media houses must
be ready to report all the violations of press freedom as well as violence
against journalists, no matter the media houses they come from. Attacks against
Press Freedom should unite the journalists and media houses so as to win the
public’s support and be able to retaliate on government’s attacks.
The turbulent times ahead, above all,
call for courage on the part of journalists because the noble duty of being
society’s watchdogs involves those moments when Museveni is going to become
more and more desperate to silence media criticism of his government and
policies.
Freedom of the Press is an essential
civil liberty and a key element to curbing corruption, improving governance and
accelerating economic development. All aspects of society and government must
remain on the Press’ radar if the Press is to contribute to Uganda’s
sustainable justice and peace, rule of law and development.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home